Adding Insult to Injustice
Exploring differences in the role of justice perceptions and social media use on vengeful dissent in online and on-campus education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2024.1077Keywords:
Online education, social media, vengeful dissent, procedural justiceAbstract
Demand for online higher education has grown considerably in recent years but comes with a unique set of challenges. Online students often experience lower sense of connection, which may give impetus to join student-led social media groups. Use of these groups may exacerbate another challenge: the reportedly greater levels of vengeful dissent towards staff from online students, which, in on-campus students, has been linked to low procedural justice perceptions. This study explored the association between procedural justice perceptions and vengeful dissent in online and on-campus education, examining the moderating effect of student-led social media groups. A total of 127 adults (M age = 25.46, SD = 7.82; 73.22% female) who were either studying or had recently completed a degree at an Australian university in either fully online or on-campus mode (64 online; 63 on-campus) completed an online self-report survey. As hypothesised, low procedural justice perceptions were more strongly associated with greater vengeful dissent in online students and use of student-led social media groups strengthened the association in online students only. The findings represent the first to empirically explore the justice perception-dissent relationship in online learning and have several implications for policy and practice in navigating online education.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lauren Shaw, Nicole Hedge
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.