Marking ‘on the fly’ in interactive oral assessments in Business

Abstract

Interactive orals (IOs) are described as a pedagogically rigorous and authentic form of assessment. However, there is little research to-date on the assessor experience of facilitating a conversation and marking ‘on the fly’, nor the student experience of thinking ‘on the spot’. This paper investigates assessor and student experiences of IOs in the context of a large Australian business school where IOs were implemented in five courses from several sub-disciplines. Participant interviews confirmed what is already known about IOs and their place as an assured assessment of learning in the Artificial Intelligence (AI) age. This study contributes to new knowledge on the assessor experience and suggests that academics will need a distinct skillset to ensure reliable and valid ‘conversational’ assessments.